Column by Scott Thorne
Posted by Scott Thorne on August 22, 2016 @ 3:35 am CT
Following up on Marcus King’s column last week about using Pokemon Go to draw in customers, I had a few customers excitedly point out (and other stores figuratively shaking their head over) this video AOL posted showing the small fortune lurking in the back of your closet in the form of old Pokemon cards. Sorry but to paraphrase Mark Twain, "It just ain’t so."
There are three main reasons why the Pokemon cards collected back in the 1990s aren’t worth the eye-popping sums shown in the video:
You probably don’t have those cards. If you look closely at the cards as they flash by, you will notice that a number of them indicate they are miss-cut or miss-printed cards or that they were prize cards given out to winners of major Pokemon tournaments. These cards are extremely scarce and, while they can command the price shown in the video, it is highly unlikely any of them found their way into the binder that has sat on the top shelf in that closet in the basement for the past 15 years. Much like anything else, scarcity drives the price up.
Mint condition. The prices asked and offered are for cards in mint condition. The vast majority of cards from the 1990s belonged to 6 to 12 year olds, who were not of the mind to treat their cards as collector’s items. They bought the cards, played with them (often unsleeved) and shoved them into binder pages, not overly concerned with how well they fit into the page. As any comic collector will tell you, the difference between an item graded at 9.8 and one graded at 8.8 can run 50% or more. Even today, kids who buy Pokemon cards are not inclined to treat them as potential collector’s items. They want to play with the cards.
listed at $2355.99. Will they get that price for it? I really, really, REALLY doubt it. A quick search of eBay completed listings shows shrinkwrapped copies selling right around a $40 price point, a far cry from $2355. Would I like to ask $2355 for it? Sure, but that would make it one of the most expensive items in the store. Asking price and the price you can reasonably expect to get for an item often differ wildly.
As I told parents during the last Pokemon boom, buy decks, buy packs, buy cards, preferably from us, but don’t plan to fund your kids’ college education from them. Look at Pokemon for what it is, a enjoyable game, not an investment vehicle.
The opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff of ICv2.com.
Column by Scott Thorne
November 28, 2022
This week, columnist Scott Thorne looks at weekend sales and prospects for the season.
No Response from Ox Eye
November 25, 2022
The default judgment was made because Ox Eye did not contest or otherwise respond to the suit.
Column by Steve Bennett
November 23, 2022
This week, columnist Steve Bennett discusses a new manga-style Popeye comic, a kawaii Tom and Jerry cartoon, and Darcy Lewis in the new Scarlet Witch comic series.
Column by Rob Salkowitz
November 21, 2022
The study from online fan platform Fandom identified four primary fan personas around different kinds of content.