The first time I saw the story it was on the Ars Technica website in a piece titled, "Forget movie villains--it’s the 'good' superheroes that are the most violent," which came with the subheading "Heroes are more likely than villains to fight and even murder." But over the next couple of days, I kept seeing it in various forms online in sites from the UK to Indonesia. Always with headlines like, "Hollywood superheroes are actually super bullies”, “Forget movie villains--it’s the 'good' superheroes that are the most violent," "Superheroes are MORE violent than villains and send ‘negative messages’ to kids," "Hollywood superheroes are actually super bullies," and my favorite, "From Spiderman to Batman: Superheroes are MORE violent than villains as scientists urge children not to ‘emulate their idols’."
The story behind those headlines was "…at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics," where "Pennsylvania pediatrician Robert Olympia and his colleagues sat through 10 superhero movies released in 2015 and 2016, cataloging each specific act of violence and noting whether it was committed by a protagonist or villain." Their findings: heroes performed more violent acts, used more lethal weapons and committed more murders than the villains.
In a statement, Dr. Olympia (which would make a pretty good name for either a hero or a villain) said, "Pediatric health care providers should educate families about the violence depicted in this genre of film and the potential dangers that may occur when children attempt to emulate these perceived heroes." And John Muller, a medical student who presented the findings, suggested the films should be watched as a family so the consequences of violence could be discussed. He said, "In passively co-viewing violent media, there is an implicit message that parents approve of what their children are seeing, and previous studies show a corresponding increase in aggressive behavior." And by "taking an active role in their children's media consumption by co-viewing and actively mediating…, parents help their children develop critical thinking and internally regulated values."
From these headlines, I had been expecting an anti-superhero diatribe, but Dr. Olympia and Mr. Miller’s suggestions seem entirely reasonable. And if the statistics about superheroes in superhero movies committing violent acts cited are accurate, it makes one wonder what a similar study would find in superhero comic books.
But if you do want to read an anti-superhero diatribe, might I suggest "’These men are bad role models’; will my son get over his superhero obsession?" by Tanya Gold which appeared in the UK’s Guardian. Its subhead: "Superman, Batman, Iron Man, can a little boy be rescued from their-like grip?" Gold is entirely upfront about the fact that she doesn’t care for superheroes ("this cultural import from America, and as fashionable as rage") or their films ("I watch the interminable sequence of Avengers and X-Men films with ever-growing boredom and disgust"), but her real concern is for her young son who is "obsessed" with them.
Obsessed has been placed in quotes because, from her descriptions of him, her son seems to be a perfectly ordinary little boy who happens to like superheroes. However, I’ll concede that as a parent, Gold has good reason to be concerned about the violence and aggression in superhero films and how it might affect her child. But if she considers movie superheroes bad role models, she should be made aware that there are superheroes who are good role models. They can be found in the pages of the many kid-friendly superhero comics being published by Marvel and DC.
* When some Latin baby
Says yes, no, or maybe
Each man is for himself!
The opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editorial staff of ICv2.com.
